1951 and 1967 (Geneva) Convention to the Status for Refugees
The Convention entered into force on 22 April 1954 and has been subject to only one amendment in the form of a 1967 Protocol which removed the geographic and temporal limits of the 1951 Convention. Although grounded in Article 14 of the Universal Declaration of human rights 1948 which recognises the right of persons to seek asylum from persecution in other countries. The United Nations Convention relating to the Status of Refugees adopted in 1951 is the centrepiece of international refugee protection today. This would relate to events occurring before 1st January 1951. The rights of refugees has lost significance due to the fact there have been geopolitical changes, and that this treaty did not have terrorists and extremists in mind. United Nations had not anticipated that there would be violence on a very high scale, and that there would be mass exodus of refugees.
The European Union Council Directive 2004/83/EC of 29th April 2004 on minimum standards for the qualification and status of third country nationals or stateless persons as refugees or as persons who otherwise need international protection, and the content of the protection granted.
There is a difference between Asylum seekers, Refugees and Economic migrants. It is the migrants who abused the system by seeking money, jobs and homes for free while the genuine cases of refugees needs more help. Asylum seekers would decades ago be seeking asylum for only political reasons.
The 1951 (Geneva) Convention to the Status for Refugees is outdated.
There should have been proper processing and supporting refugees going to any signatory country. There have been fraudulent documentation for those who wants to be in a humanitarian program who faces threats to life and freedom.
A data is greatly needed for any signatory countries to keep track of refugees getting help in one country, and then moving to another country to order to get more money. A refugee can easily obtain finance or benefits, say in Germany, and then obtain money in Austria which is fraudulent and abusing the States. There have been cases when refugees are moving around freely from country to country taking advantage of each State.
It is right that Asylum seekers, Refugees and Migrants seek protection from United Nations, but they have no rights to risk their lives by going on a perilous journey without protection. It is the United Nations responsibility to provide protection before they do. If they have to be returned to the destination from which they came, then they have to have protection to go back where they came from.
It was an appalling situation that all these refugees who came by boats should be allowed to land with the help of warships owned by different countries. They should have taken all the refugees back with protection.
Some of these refugees have committed crimes such as sex crimes, theft, and fraud. They are unsettling countries in which they are in, while we should think of its own civilians safety and protection of each country from the refugees. The health and safety of civilians of their own country is paramount, and they should not take second place to refugees losing their homes, jobs and livelihoods to them. Civilians have more rights than refugees.
Refugees can only live in any country temporarily, and must have legal status to live in any country by registering legally as a citizen. They must then return to their own country, when it is safe to do so. They are safer in their own country, than in another country.
It is the United Nations' responsibility to oversee that any country is safe for refugees to return, and making sure that each country is free of any terrorists and extremists by cooperating with these countries who are annihilating terrorists and extremists.
Merkel was so very irresponsible to introduce an open door policy which led to migrant's situation being out of control, and created a huge mess. European Union is now trying to do a deal with Turkey to clean up their mess, and bribing Turkey with billions of pounds. There are no agreements which are unlikely to implement which could violate the Treaty of 1951 (Geneva) Convention to the Status for Refugees. As well as violations of human rights.
The European Union Council Directive 2004/83/EC of 29th April 2004 on minimum standards for the qualification and status of third country nationals or stateless persons as refugees or as persons who otherwise need international protection, and the content of the protection granted.
There is a difference between Asylum seekers, Refugees and Economic migrants. It is the migrants who abused the system by seeking money, jobs and homes for free while the genuine cases of refugees needs more help. Asylum seekers would decades ago be seeking asylum for only political reasons.
The 1951 (Geneva) Convention to the Status for Refugees is outdated.
There should have been proper processing and supporting refugees going to any signatory country. There have been fraudulent documentation for those who wants to be in a humanitarian program who faces threats to life and freedom.
A data is greatly needed for any signatory countries to keep track of refugees getting help in one country, and then moving to another country to order to get more money. A refugee can easily obtain finance or benefits, say in Germany, and then obtain money in Austria which is fraudulent and abusing the States. There have been cases when refugees are moving around freely from country to country taking advantage of each State.
It is right that Asylum seekers, Refugees and Migrants seek protection from United Nations, but they have no rights to risk their lives by going on a perilous journey without protection. It is the United Nations responsibility to provide protection before they do. If they have to be returned to the destination from which they came, then they have to have protection to go back where they came from.
It was an appalling situation that all these refugees who came by boats should be allowed to land with the help of warships owned by different countries. They should have taken all the refugees back with protection.
Some of these refugees have committed crimes such as sex crimes, theft, and fraud. They are unsettling countries in which they are in, while we should think of its own civilians safety and protection of each country from the refugees. The health and safety of civilians of their own country is paramount, and they should not take second place to refugees losing their homes, jobs and livelihoods to them. Civilians have more rights than refugees.
Refugees can only live in any country temporarily, and must have legal status to live in any country by registering legally as a citizen. They must then return to their own country, when it is safe to do so. They are safer in their own country, than in another country.
It is the United Nations' responsibility to oversee that any country is safe for refugees to return, and making sure that each country is free of any terrorists and extremists by cooperating with these countries who are annihilating terrorists and extremists.
Merkel was so very irresponsible to introduce an open door policy which led to migrant's situation being out of control, and created a huge mess. European Union is now trying to do a deal with Turkey to clean up their mess, and bribing Turkey with billions of pounds. There are no agreements which are unlikely to implement which could violate the Treaty of 1951 (Geneva) Convention to the Status for Refugees. As well as violations of human rights.
http://sputniknews.com/europe/20160308/1035976217/eu-turkey-migrant-deal-flawed.html
Broken promises and lack of leadership imperil latest EU-Turkey migrant deal. Flaws in agreements.
http://tass.ru/en/politics/861192
No comments:
Post a Comment